Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brittany Ashton Holmes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:33, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brittany Ashton Holmes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and WP:NACTOR. IW. (talk) 08:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. IW. (talk) 08:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. IW. (talk) 08:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.eonline.com/ap/news/1062350/the-little-rascals-turns-25-where-are-the-child-stars-now#photo-1022367E! Online
https://variety.com/1994/film/reviews/the-little-rascals-1200438268/Variety
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/thelittlerascalspghowe_a0b07d.htmWashington Post
I would expect there to be further coverage of the subject in articles on The Little Rascals that I have not been able to access, like Los Angeles Times reviews. I think there may be enough, overall, to just meet the notability standards. Dflaw4 (talk) 09:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I really wish people would actually add the sources they find to articles instead of just bringing them up at AFD. An article on a living person that is only sourced to iMDB violates our policies since BLP guidelines say that everything must be reliably sourced and IMDb is not reliable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 19:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:32, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.